In order to accept a text message as evidence, it must be established that it is relevant, i.e. relevant to the decision or outcome of the clinical trial. It would seem that an innocent text message can be regarded as important evidence of whether it helps to locate the suspect or reinforces additional evidence in a given case. To present a text message as evidence in a Texas court, authenticity is one of the biggest obstacles to overcoming it. As with all admissible evidence in criminal proceedings, a defense attorney may object to sending text messages to the court. A text message may not be admissible as evidence if it is considered to be a rumor. The person presenting the text as potential evidence is slightly different from buying the defendant’s phone and using what is on the defendant’s phone as evidence. Since text messages are electronic messages that can be provided, the question arises as to when they can be used as evidence in trade disputes. When a person sends a text message, the last thing “he” thinks about is that an SMS message against “him” can be used in court. This can be difficult to prove, especially if the text is sent from a personal phone and there is a story that shows that the suspect was the primary user. The outcome of your case may depend on many factors, including the possibility of using text messages against you. You should provide sufficient evidence that the text comes from the phone number and source mentioned in the message. If you are dealing with trade disputes, it is important to consult a lawyer in Dallas to discuss your case.