The investigation was even found in many places that have lists of Brady, prosecutors and police, will not be made public, making it impossible to know if they comply with the law prescribed by the Supreme Court of the United States. The investigation revealed that many prosecutors and police officers failed to reach a landmark verdict in 1963 in Brady v. Jurors, and it was never said that the police officer had been convicted of his department no less than 35 times. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in this landmark case that prosecutors must declare anyone accused of a crime on the basis of all the evidence that can assist their defense in the trial. Neither Vara nor her defense attorney knew the police officer’s story at the time of the trial. As experienced defense attorneys in Dallas, we know firsthand how the testimony of a police officer can influence a case against a defendant. This includes revealing all the details about police officers who have committed crimes, lied, or whose honesty has been questioned. The trial jury believed the cop. USA TODAY found at least 1,200 officers with verifiable histories of lies and other serious behavior problems that prosecutors did not recognize. In cases where it is a police officer’s word against the defendant’s, jurors often believe in the police officer. Houston police and prosecutors were aware of Lindsey’s case. It is important for the jury to know if the officer has a record of deception or dishonesty at the time of trial. There are no lists of dishonest or unreliable police officers in the provinces and territories. The investigation revealed that at least 300 prosecutors across the country are not taking any action to comply with Supreme Court orders.